3 Million Dolalr LASIK Malpractice Verdict Against 2005 Cataract and Refractive Surgeon of the Year, Dr. Eric D. Donnefeld 3000000 dolalr LASIK治療不當行為的判決對2005年白內障和屈光手術的一年，博士，李家祥四donnefeld
Keith, Shapiro & Ford, a Garden City, New York based law firm received a three million dollar verdict in a LASIK Malpractice Trial in Nassau County, New York involving a LASIK surgery performed on January 7, 2000 (index number 8476/2002).祁俊文，夏皮羅與福特汽車，花園城，新的紐約法律事務所收到了300.0萬美元的判決，在LASIK治療不當審判在拿騷縣，紐約，涉及LASIK手術的表現對2000年1月7日（索引號碼二千○二分之八千四百七十六） 。
The plaintiff (a 43 year old woman) suffered from post–LASIK ectasia which was claimed to have resulted from pre-existing form fruste keratoconus as well as an insufficient residual stromal bed.原告（ 1 43年歲女子）遭受LASIK術後擴張是聲稱已導致從學前教育的存在形式fruste圓錐角膜，也是一個不足，剩餘基質床。 It was also claimed that the informed consent was insufficient notwithstanding an eight page Informed Consent Document, a video, a brochure and a general discussion of the risks with a referring optometrist.也有人聲稱該知情同意是不夠的，儘管1 8頁的知情同意文件，視頻，一本小冊子和一般性討論的風險與所指的視光師。
The Defendant doctor was Eric D. Donnefeld.被告醫生李家祥四donnefeld 。 Donnenfeld who was chosen as the 2005 National Cataract and Refractive Surgeon of the Year by the Journal Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today.的成本為零的人被選定為2005年全國白內障和屈光外科醫生的年由日刊白內障和屈光手術今天。 Dr. Donnenfeld is Dr. Donnenfeld is a National Medical Director of TLC.博士的成本為零，是博士的成本為零是一個全國性的醫療主任薄層色譜法。 has according to his website has trained more surgeons to perform refractive surgery than any other doctor in New York.已根據他的網站已經培訓了更多的外科醫生執行屈光手術，比任何其他的醫生在紐約舉行。
The case took nine days to complete and the jury deliberated for approximately five hours.案件九天完成和陪審團審議了大約五個小時。 The total jury verdict broken down as $1,000,000.00 for past pain and suffering, $1,000,000.00 for future pain and suffering and $1,000,000.00 for future medical expenses.總陪審團的判決細分為百萬點○○美元為過去的痛苦和苦難，一百萬點〇 〇美元為未來的痛苦和苦難和百萬點○○美元為未來的醫療費用。 There was never an offer on the case.有沒有一個提供關於此案的。 The jury rejected the insufficient residual stromal bed theory but found a departure as to the diagnoses of form fruste keratoconus and they also found the informed consent to be inadequate.陪審團否定了不足，剩餘基質床理論，但發現一離境，以診斷的形式fruste圓錐角膜，他們還發現，知情同意是不夠的。
You may also like to read您也可以想讀
- Delayed Lasik Surgery Malpractice Claim Permitted by Indiana Supreme Court延遲LASIK手術醫療事故索賠所允許的印第安納最高法院
- Eye Surgeon Wins Lasik Malpractice Case Due to Negligence眼外科醫生勝LASIK治療不當行為案件由於疏忽
- Cataract Surgery Initiative Running Ahead of Target白內障手術的倡議運行未來的目標
- Inform Eye Doctors About Prostate Drugs Before Eye Surgery可否告知眼科的醫生約前列腺藥物之前，眼科手術
- Photorefractive Keratectomy: Laser Eye Surgery Alternative Gains Prominance屈光性角膜切削術：激光眼科手術的替代收益突出
- High Quality Eye Care Clinic Now at Chandivali高品質的眼睛護理診所，現在在chandivali
- Risk of Nuclear Cataract Reduced by Statin的風險，核性白內障減少他汀類
- WiFi Allows Indian Eye Specialists to Screen Patients in Remote Cinics無線網絡連接，使印度的眼科專科醫生，屏幕上的病人在偏遠cinics
- Best of The Fortnight Ending 20th November 2005最好的兩星期結尾2005年11月20日
- Cataract Surgery Becoming More Common in US白內障手術已越來越常見，在美國
